SBF's lawyer completed the closing argument and insisted on defending SBF not guilty.
SBF's attorney Mark S. Cohen completed his closing argument in court on Wednesday evening local time, requesting the court and jury to find that SBF acted in "good faith" throughout its operation of FTX and Alameda Research, and therefore cannot be found guilty of fraud. In his closing argument, the attorney stated that it was "real-world miscommunications," "mistakes," and "delays" that harmed other members of FTX and Bankman-Fried's crypto empire, not intentional fraud.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Inflation print calms markets, but tariffs still loom
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said tariffs are “worth it” even if they plunge the US economy into recession territory

XRP News: XRPTurbo Set To Enhance XRP DeFi Ecosystem With AI-Powered DApps And Tokenization Tools
‘Markets Are Gonna Soar’: Trump Shows Confidence as Inflation Cools and Stocks Rise
An FTX/Alameda-associated address released 185,000 SOL stakes
Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








