Prezzo di TypeAITYPE

Account Number: 0715582819 Account Name: PRINCE CHUKWUNAE GREGORY Account Type: PREMIER SAVINGS Bank: Access Bank Nigeria please i need may payment non

It seems like you're interested in trading on Biget. However, I need a bit more information to provide the best assistance. Could you please clarify: 1. Are you referring to Biget Markets, a trading platform? 2. What type of trading are you interested in (e.g., forex, stocks, cryptocurrencies)? 3. Do you have any specific questions about trading on Biget?

It seems like you're interested in trading on Biget. However, I need a bit more information to provide the best assistance. Could you please clarify: 1. Are you referring to Biget Markets, a trading platform? 2. What type of trading are you interested in (e.g., forex, stocks, cryptocurrencies)? 3. Do you have any specific questions about trading on Biget?

🛑Introduction Moving averages are a popular indicator in crypto trading, helping traders identify trends, spot potential reversals, and make informed trading decisions. This article explores the concept of moving averages, their types, and how to use them effectively in crypto trading. 🛑Types of Moving Averages There are several types of moving averages, including simple moving averages (SMA), exponential moving averages (EMA), and weighted moving averages (WMA). Each type has its strengths and weaknesses. 🛑Using Moving Averages in Crypto Trading Moving averages can be used in various ways in crypto trading, such as identifying trends, spotting potential reversals, and setting stop-loss levels. Traders should experiment with different types and periods of moving averages to find what works best for them. 🛑Conclusion In conclusion, moving averages are a powerful indicator in crypto trading, offering traders valuable insights into trends and potential reversals. By understanding how to use moving averages effectively, traders can improve their trading strategy and increase their chances of success.

Interop is fracturing I've recently noticed that more and more the different types of interop protocols are banding together to drive narratives that are more +ve for the segment that they're in. Which is fine but seems like a little more adversarial stance has worked its way in and interop no longer seems as chummy as they once were. I mean I saw supporters of a bridge badgering the founder of an aggregator about why they've yet to be integrated. I'm sure a lot more similar type things are happening as each vies for more order flow and dominance. Bridges continue to drive the importance of their technology, aggregators continue to drive that you only need them to swap across chains, chain abstraction is now pushing that they make it simpler than everyone else combined from a UX perspective. Is anyone of them wrong? I don't think so. But are all of them right? Highly unlikely. This quite honestly reminds me of the parable of the blind men and the elephant. Where each described what they could tell based on what they touched. Which is the same as what's happening with the interop folks (all good ppl btw), where it could well be a situation of the blind leading the blind because each person's experience and knowledge is limited by what they know. In my opinion, interop is a lot larger than how they explain it. In some of their minds, it's a world where their protocol is and remains dominant. Maybe that happens, maybe it won't. I don't know and I bet you none of them knows either regardless of how they pose it on socials. If you look at how the interop space has changed since 2021, it becomes evident. Bridges that were once dominant and commanded order flow have seen volumes drop as protocols with more efficient offerings became more utilized. Others disappeared due to exploits or even failed models that were unsustainable. If you think this won't or can't happen again, you'd be dead wrong. Rather than arguing semantics based on the part of the elephant being touched, interop players need to come together despite their differences to shape the segment as we march forward into the future. What you think will shape the interop space may not hold true in future and working closely together with other players (not just chatting in spaces) is what's necessary. Now I know most may have to be heralds for the protocols they work for and their success is tied to the protocols success. Thankfully I'm not encumbered by such shackles and I can and will say what I think. Has interop successfully solved users problems moving across chains? In a way, yes. Is interop solved? Hell no. Are interop frontends important? Nice to have but will matter little over time. Will fees be the key growth driver? Unfortunately, I don't think so. My thesis is most cross-chain transactions from retail will earn protocols maybe 20% of total revenue... What about the other 80%??? 😉🤐 Anyway... Just thought I'd dump some thoughts on a Sunday evening. It's a hot take but it's what keeps people on their toes. Gm, Gm and have a good week ahead.