Giá Real RealmREAL

In the not too distant future @dexscreener and defi token exchanges will be filled with tokens representing actual companies and projects with boards and budgets, with profit making strategies. MEMEs were a liveness test of the system. The system is simple. Allow anyone to create a ledger on the network and let all the decentralized marketplaces allow it to be traded with real people globally. A global capital market. The test was HIGHLY successful. The technology is more than ready to scale initial coin offerings of regulated and registered entities of all shapes and sizes. Next up: Regulation. Starts with Stable Coin Regulation, this is the liquidity injection which will be swapped between users for commerce, and swapped in and out of assets in the internet capital markets. Then the regulation of digital assets, and the guidelines to ICO under the new Commerce Secretary, the CFTC and the SEC. All markets are preparing. What can you do? You need to stock up on the network tokens of these networks that will form the intetrnet capital markets. Accumulate the most adopted, most performant network tokens now, before the markups on public advertising of these new markets. The lower your cost basis now, the more equity you will have to invest later when $APPL, $TSLA, $COIN, $NVDA and @Starlink become tokenized and swappable for network value tokens. Its 2025 think bigger, Ive tried to paint the picture as best I can but you need to smarten up.

Whats the difference between crypto tokens, game artifacts and any other digital value? My view on Digital Asset Regulation. You might not know this. Computer Gaming "Skins" are outperforming stocks and crypto right now. While crypto is stuck in suppression waiting for sovereign entry through beuracratic approval, the CS2 gaming skin and artifact market is booming. The total value of digital weapon skins in CS2 has now exceeded $4.3 billion, and one skin was recently sold for $1 million. More and more players see skins as an investment – the game’s popularity keeps pushing prices higher. While some are waiting for crypto to recover, others are flipping digital weapons and clothing in games for massive profits. So once again @DavidSacks @BankingGOP @SenatorTimScott @SECGov @HesterPeirce @CarolineDPham what is the difference between blockchain tokens and gaming skins? They are both the same thing according to Howey. The Howey is BROKEN in 2025. Rewrite a new test including digital and decentralized, non-counterparty public value. You cannot massage this domain to fit a 1934 rule test thats idiotic. Restart - I have ideas. Notes: - These gaming markets and crypto casinos are not regulated. Why? Whats the difference? - Why was crypto called a security 4 years ago? Whats the difference? - Please address this fundemental right to own and trade digital value, no matter what it is. It is a first ammendment right. - It is digital perceived value and has cryptographic security. Catch up please. We can choose to give value to anything we want. It is not up to the administration to decide what is valuable. IMO: Blockchain network tokens have never been securities. There are no counterparties. One side is a machine running code and the other a machine running a wallet. There is no 1934 law that applies to this. Write new ones for the love of everything good. Tokens can represent anything. Thats why they called "tokens". Categories of blockchain tokens: - 1) Public Blockchain Network Native Tokens $BTC $ETH $SOL etc. - commodities. Public. Decentralized. No counterparties. New registration guideline required. They are not companies. There is no owner. They are publically owned and fall under GNU license for open source like Linux. Regulate under the Public Services commissions if anything to protect them. Own a Reserve of these to protect the public networks from foreign collusion. It is national security in 2025. These are commodities if they are sufficiently decentralized and heavily adopted. There can never be "companies" behind these. They are public open source and renounced. Their governance is through democratic voting. They have no jurisdiction and exist all over the world on the public internet. - 2) Private Network Native Tokens - tokens issued by companies on their own blockchain network (counterparties) - these can be private or public but have a clear agreement between a company and a user. These are securities under Howey but probably on a case by case basis require a new S-1 process to register as public services or public investments per jurisdiction. - 2) Utility Tokens - Tokens that are issued on public blockchain networks that represent something of value or an agreement between 2 counterparties. These can be Security Tokens, which are digital S-1 obligations tokenized on the blockchain. They can be Access Tokens which holders get the right to pass a digital gate for entry into another area of functionality, access or entry in the physical world. These can be Collectible Tokens, that have no use, no meaning and are just something someone wants to own for emotional reasons. These can be RWA or Tokenized Real World Assets like shares and fractional ownership and rights. There are forms of utility tokens but they need to be regulated totally differently from Native Tokens, they have very little in common. I am available to help with these guidelines and have been in software in this domain since graduating MSC in Computer Science in Cape Town South Africa. Ive worked in the predecessor of blockchain, CORBA, Ive seen it all and have already been down the path of defining the domain. Let me help at least strawman the problem space. Some data: Here is the Counter Strike 2 Skins market vs Stocks and Crypto in 2025. Are these skins securities?

The U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs announced on March 6 that Chairman Tim Scott (R-S.C.) is leading an effort to eliminate the use of reputational risk in banking regulations through the Financial Integrity and Regulation Management (FIRM) Act. The legislation, supported by all Republican members of the committee, aims to prevent federal banking agencies from using reputational risk as a supervisory factor when evaluating financial institutions. Scott emphasized the urgency of addressing debanking, stating: As Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, I have made addressing debanking a top priority. This discriminatory and un-American practice should concern everyone … It’s clear that federal regulators have abused reputational risk by carrying out a political agenda against federally legal businesses. “This legislation, which eliminates all references to reputational risk in regulatory supervision, is the first step in ending debanking once and for all,” he added. Other committee Republicans, including Senators Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), echoed Scott’s concerns, arguing that regulators have misused their authority to unfairly deny financial services to lawful businesses. Scott has made debanking a primary focus of his leadership, holding hearings and discussions to investigate cases where regulators pressured financial institutions to sever ties with certain clients. In a recent Senate Banking Committee hearing, Scott challenged Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on the issue, leading Powell to commit to working with the committee to address it. The FIRM Act mandates the removal of reputational risk from regulatory supervision, prohibits federal agencies from implementing related policies, and requires agencies to report to Congress on compliance. Scott and his Republican colleagues argue that the bill is necessary to ensure financial regulators do not use their authority to enforce political agendas under the guise of regulatory oversight. Several senators condemned what the lawmakers see as an abuse of regulatory power, particularly targeting industries or individuals based on political considerations. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) strongly criticized financial regulators, stating: “Federal banking agencies have brazenly abused their power, strangling legitimate businesses through politically motivated ‘reputational risk’ designations while hiding behind a façade of independence. The FIRM Act strips away their ability to play politics with our financial system and finally holds these unelected bureaucrats accountable.” She added: Americans deserve a transparent regulatory framework that fosters innovation in digital assets instead of smothering it with government overreach. We’re putting these rogue regulators on notice—their days of unchecked power are over. Other senators, including Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) and Katie Britt (R-Ala.), argued that the legislation would restore fairness by ensuring regulators base decisions on objective financial risks rather than political preferences. Senator Tillis added that the FIRM Act would “stop this political weaponization and ensure regulators focus on real financial risks, not personal or political agendas.” 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only. As ETH and LINK push past resistance levels, BitLemons is gaining traction with its GambleFi protocol, capturing investors’ attention. Table of Contents Has BitLemons found the formula for sustainable growth? Is Chainlink positioning for a new all-time high? When will Ethereum break its resistance? Conclusion As Ethereum’s technical breakthroughs and Chainlink’s double-digit gains dominate headlines, savvy investors are quietly positioning themselves in BitLemons (BLEM) before it hits exchanges. With its GambleFi protocol already generating revenue, dual security audits, and a presale that’s 49% complete in Stage 2, BLEM offers a ground-floor access to what analysts predict could be crypto’s next massive growth story. Has BitLemons found the formula for sustainable growth? BitLemons is disrupting the $450 billion traditional casino market with its GambleFi protocol that’s already operational with over 8,000 games from premium providers including Evolution and Pragmatic. Unlike speculative tokens, BitLemons generates revenue 24/7 while allocating 30% of all Gross Gaming Revenue directly to token holders — 15% through strategic buyback and burn mechanisms creating deflationary pressure, and 15% as high-yield staking rewards. With dual security audits from SpyWolf and SolidProof (validation that competitors may not match) and $1 million raised in its private seed round, BitLemons has massive momentum. Stage 1 sold out in 16 days, and Stage 2 is already 49% complete at $0.02 per token, with over $1.62 million raised. With fewer than 17 million tokens remaining before the price increases to $0.03 in 13 days and industry insiders projecting a listing price between $0.17 – $0.18, early investors are positioning themselves for potential 8-9x returns from current levels. You might also like: Can BitLemons’ presale momentum outpace Cardano and TRUMP in 2025? Is Chainlink positioning for a new all-time high? Chainlink has demonstrated remarkable resilience, trading at $16.41 with an 8.90% surge over the past week. The decentralized oracle network continues to expand its ecosystem, establishing itself as a critical infrastructure connecting smart contracts with real-world data. LINK’s technical indicators reveal a decisive breakout above key resistance levels, accompanied by a high trading volume of $1.14b. The token has established strong support at the $15.00 level while facing resistance near $17.50. With a market capitalization now exceeding $10.40b and bullish sentiment at 87%, institutional interest continues to flow into the project as it cements its position as an essential blockchain infrastructure. When will Ethereum break its resistance? Ethereum has been steadily reclaiming lost ground, trading at $2,126.64 with a 1.2% gain over the past day. Despite recent security concerns — including reports of hackers linked to North Korea’s Lazarus Group laundering nearly 500,000 ETH — the market remains optimistic about Ethereum’s fundamentals. ETH’s $254.82b market cap is supported by a significant trading volume of $19.49b, signaling renewed investor confidence in the smart contract platform. The launch of the Pectra upgrade testnet has bolstered expectations for improved scalability and transaction efficiency, addressing long-standing user concerns. Key support has formed at $2,100 with resistance around $2,300, suggesting a potential continuation of the upward trajectory if market conditions remain favorable. Conclusion While Ethereum and Chainlink present compelling cases for continued growth, BitLemons stands apart with its revenue-generating platform already in operation. At $0.02 in Stage 2 and analysts projecting listing prices of $0.17 – $0.18, the mathematical advantage becomes clear. With Stage 2 already 49% complete and 13 days remaining until the next price increase, the ground-floor opportunity is disappearing. The question savvy investors are asking is how substantial a position to establish before this window closes. For more information on BitLemons, visit the website or socials. Read more: Is BitLemons quietly becoming a bigger opportunity than Bitcoin and TRUMP? Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. crypto.news does not endorse any product mentioned on this page. Users must do their own research before taking any actions related to the company.

Newbies: Extreme Fear Real bitcoiners: Extreme Fomo